Skip to main content
0
Monthly Archives

March 2025

Confessions of an Average Adman

By Personal JourneyNo Comments

From Stock Image to Storyteller
(An unauthorized remake of a book nobody reads anymore)


Confession 1: I Looked the Part Before I Knew the Lines
Long before I had a voice, I had the uniform.
Stock glasses. Stock smirk. Stock “creative” headshot—shot against a brick wall, obviously.
I looked like I had ideas.
I didn’t.
But I could quote Ogilvy.
And in this industry, that’s halfway to thought leadership.


Confession 2: I Didn’t Know What I Was Doing. So I Made a Deck About It.
My early ideas were… bad.
Like “rebrand almonds for Gen Z” bad.
But I learned that confidence matters more than craft.
So I made slides. Lots of slides.
Slides with arrows.
Slides with purpose statements that made people cry (or at least blink slowly).

Every time I felt lost, I’d write “insight-led, culturally resonant, emotionally compelling.”
No one ever asked what it meant.


Confession 3: I Wasn’t Breaking Molds—I Was Downloading Templates
Every “brave” campaign I pitched had three references from the same Cannes shortlist.
Every “original” strategy had the same three buzzwords.
I thought I was shaping culture.
Turns out, I was recycling decks from 2017 with slightly newer fonts.

And still, I got promoted.
Because in advertising, you either stand out—or stand in the right room long enough to blend in strategically.


Confession 4: The Real Turning Point (Was a Google Drive Folder)
It wasn’t a burn out.
It wasn’t a post by David Trott. 
It wasn’t a shooting in South Africa.
It was opening a folder titled “Final_Final_V37_FORREAL_THISONE.pptx”
Inside: 46 decks. Same case studies. Same fonts. Same “bold” ideas.

It hit me:
I wasn’t storytelling.
I was stock-piling.
A human Pinterest board of recycled cleverness.


Confession 5: I Found My Voice When I Lost My Pitch
One day, the client didn’t bite.
Not because the idea was too risky.
Because it was exactly like the last three they’d seen.
The silence that followed wasn’t defeat.
It was relief.


Confession 6: I Still Look Like a Stock Image. But Now I Write My Own prompts in Chat GTP.
Let’s be honest:
I’m still The Average Adman.
I still wear black.
Still quote Droga (ironically now).
Still get excited about ad campaigns that make no sense but look great on Instagram.

But something changed:
Now I know it’s a costume.
Now I say the quiet parts out loud.
Now I make fun of the system—from inside it.

Because the truth is:
Every creative wants to stand out.
But the boldest thing you can do in this industry?

Embrace your averageness.
And say it out loud.

And just like this, there’s the link to the store.

The World is Broken. Your Brand Should be Trying to Fix It.

By Brand Purpose & ResponsibilityNo Comments

CRITICIZING PURPOSE IS SO AVERAGE ADMAN. SO I MADE A POST ABOUT IT, TOO.

The planet’s melting. Democracies are glitching. Billionaires are launching themselves into space while your cousin can’t afford rent.
And somewhere in the middle of this dystopian musical…
your snack brand drops a climate-positive tortilla chip.

Because in the face of global collapse, what we need isn’t policy or action.
It’s branded content.
Short-form. Optimized. Shot in 4K with subtle lens flares and a whispered voiceover that says:
“We believe in better.”

Humanity is crumbling under environmental, societal, and economic pressure…
and brands are showing up with moodboards.
Ticking boxes. Chasing KPIs.
Launching Purpose™ like it’s a limited-edition product drop.

And sure—some brands do try.
Patagonia. Dove. Ben & Jerry’s.
The Holy Trinity of Case Study Slides.
But for every one of them, there are a thousand others trying to solve systemic inequality with a seasonal hashtag and a DE&I panel moderated by their Head of HR.

We keep saying brands have power.
That they should lead society toward change.
But most can’t even lead their own creative approval process without a nine-person Zoom and a six-week delay.

Still, the narrative persists:
“Your brand can be a catalyst for good.”
Translation: Make it look like you care—but not enough to scare shareholders.

Because real change?
That’s hard.
It’s messy.
It’s not A/B tested.

Want to change the world?
Start by paying your interns.
Then maybe don’t brief your creative team to solve racism in 48 hours with a stock image and a pun.

Let’s be honest:
Half of us only discovered social issues existed when your intern suggested a Pride post in 2018.

But now?
You’re here to save the world.
One climate-positive oat milk collab at a time.

Unless your brand is doing more than launching a new SKU with a recycled manifesto…
you’re not fixing anything.
You’re cosplaying impact.

We don’t need more brands pretending to be saviors.
We need fewer pretending they’re not part of the problem.

But still, in my next brief, I’ll probably drop another Purpose Capsule™.
Call it Hope 2.0.
Put it on a tote bag.
Sell it for €101.
(visit store for actual price)

Because if the world’s going down…
you might as well monetize the fall.

So sure—I’ll slap a purpose line under my logo. It’s cheaper than therapy..

And then what happened? As I finish “writing” this article. Chat GTP asks me: Do you want me to write a new article titled How to Save the World in 6 Paid Posts or Less”?

The Aesthetic of the Bold, Brave and Different

By Advertising Industry SatireNo Comments

Or Why Every Brand Trying to Zig Ends Up in the Same Moodboard.

What follows is not an article.
It is a cultural exorcism disguised as discourse.

A hyper-erudite critique of the cult of Boldness.
A semiotic safari through the jungle of branded quirk.
A eulogy for originality, buried beneath a drone shot and an earnest VO.

Let us begin—like all truly brave campaigns do—with a manifesto.

“We wanted to do something bold.”
The brief lies, twitching in a Figma board.
“We pushed boundaries.”
Only to find the boundaries were pre-lit and Icelandic.

In 2025, to be Bold is to follow a very specific design system.

What masquerades as “Brave” is simply a templated ballet of the performatively daring.
Every campaign wears the same turtleneck.
Reads the same Chimamanda quote.
Licenses the same slow-motion horse.

Take Patagonia’s “Silence is Loud”—a seven-minute ASMR of moss growing over a logo.
Or Moncler’s “We Are Sky”—a spoken-word short film narrated by a genderless cloud.
All very “disruptive.”
All aggressively curated to win that one specific jury vote from the Berlin strategist who once fasted in the desert for brand insight.

It is not creativity.
It is creative cosplay.

Brands are not taking risks.
They are LARPing as artists.
They are cosplaying dissent.
They are painting over sameness with very expensive absurd look and feel.

This is the aesthetic of Bold, Brave and Different:
Where blue lighting = future.
Where crying = realness.
Where every “challenger brand” is backed by a holding company older than democracy.

It is not authenticity.
It is algorithmic rebellion.

Why?
Because the safest place to hide today is inside the posture of risk.
If your brand looks like it might have opinions, it gets applauded.
Even if the opinion is just: “We see you.”

The true innovation is in the font.
The illusion of edge.
The performative gravel in the VO.
The fact that we call this “truth-telling” while the legal team has a tab open on tone policing.

In this landscape, “Different” means:
Using Helvetica but in lowercase.
Shooting in B&W but with hope.
Saying “human-first” while tracking eye-movements.

What remains is not a campaign.
It’s a cultural dress rehearsal.
For a brand too scared to be ugly, too polished to be real.

We are not witnessing bravery.
We are witnessing a well-lit, legally approved hallucination of it.

Until someone actually risks being bad, being weird, or (god forbid) being funny—
Bold will remain just another word for beige.

—The Average Adman
Adjunct Professor of Purposeful Lighting
Dean of the Faculty of Branded Bravery Studies
Guest Lecturer at the School of Expensive Nihilism

(P.S. Our unlimited-edition tote bags could come pre-crumpled, infused with rosemary, and retail at €301. They don’t but still, irony is the new integrity.)