All Posts By

Average Adman

The Average Adman is a creative consultancy disguised as a parody. We promise absolutely nothing original — and deliver it with polish. Mission: To mock the sameness of the ad industry until we’re numb enough to stay in it.

Performance + marketing is redundant (and not why you think)

By Marketing rantNo Comments

We need to talk about the word “performance.”

Somewhere along the line, we let it get hijacked. Stripped of its flair, drained of its drama, and shackled to a dashboard. Now when someone says “performance marketing,” they mean sales activation. BOF tactics. Real-time data. CTRs and ROIs and pixel-powered conversion funnels.

Which is fine. Necessary, even.

But here’s the real issue: “performance” wasn’t that.

The Stage We Forgot We Were On

Marketing has always been a performance. Not just in the metrics, but in the meaning. Not just in the numbers, but in the show.

The way a brand walks, talks, looks, lives. The way it tells stories, plays characters, and leaves a lasting impression. The way it makes people feel something they didn’t know they needed. That’s performance.

That’s performance in a showmanship sense. But somehow, we let it get reduced to click-through rates.

BOF Hijacked the Word

What frustrates me isn’t sales activation. It’s that we started calling it performance.

Performance should be how the brand performs in culture, not just how an ad performs in a funnel.

The tactical took over the theatrical. Now, unless a campaign delivers immediate returns, it’s seen as fluff. Soft. Indulgent.

Yes, all this, despite the efforts of the big Less Binets, Mark Ritsons or Byron Sharps of the world.

But marketing wasn’t built to be rational. It was built to perform.

Brand Has Always Been Performance

When Les Binet and Peter Field dropped their 60/40 wisdom, it wasn’t just a call to balance short and long. It was a plea to remember the craft. The emotional. The long-term brand magic that performs invisibly, until suddenly it performs undeniably.

System1 gave it a name: showmanship. Because the best marketing doesn’t sell—it seduces. It entertains. It stays in your head like a song you didn’t ask for but now can’t forget.

And Mark Ritson? He nailed it. It’s not the long. It’s the lasting. The brand effects that don’t just move units—they move minds.

What We Lost in the Funnel

When digital exploded, we gained tools but lost our sense of theatre.

We started optimising headlines instead of writing them. Testing emotions instead of evoking them. Measuring attention instead of earning it.

Performance marketing became performance metrics, not marketing that actually performs.

But the audience never changed. They still want to be moved, entertained, understood. They still want a show. Not a spreadsheet.

The Real Performance Marketer

The best marketers have always been performers. Not fakers—performers.

They know how to hold attention. How to make a product feel bigger than it is. How to create a moment, a myth, a meaning. That’s not fluff. That’s the main event.

And yes, BOF has its place. Sales activation should convert. But it should follow the performance, not replace it.

A Good Product Is Common. A Great Performance Isn’t.

Most products are functionally identical. But a brand with presence, with charisma, with narrative? That’s what wins.

That’s what lasts. That’s what performs.

We Don’t Need “Performance Marketing.”

We need marketing that performs.

We need to stop using the word “performance” as a synonym for conversion. It’s a disservice to the craft. It erases the emotion, the risk, the theatre.

Let BOF do its job. But let marketing reclaim its stage.

Because in an ideal world, we wouldn’t have to call it “performance marketing.”

All marketing would be performance.

Not about sales.

About the show.

And the best marketers? They’re not just analysts. They’re performers. They know that brand is the act. And sales are the applause.

So yes—let the dashboards dash. Let the BOF boys optimize.

But me? I’ll be in the wings, adjusting the spotlight. Rehearsing the lines. Making sure the brand knows how to own the stage.

Because I am The Average Adman.
I’ve built funnels that went nowhere.
Sold strategy with no soul.
And clapped for metrics I didn’t understand.

But I’ve also remembered something most of us forgot:

Marketing is not about being efficient.
It’s about being unforgettable.

Not about closing the sale.
But opening the show.

Bold. Brave. Undifferent.
averageadman.com

Now cue the music.
And let the brand perform.

It Wasn’t Me. I Was Told To.

By Advertising Industry SatireNo Comments

I used to be a reasonably sane, somewhat boring human being.
A decaf-latte type. Soft opinions. Cardigans in spring.

But then, I entered advertising.
And suddenly, the whisper began:

“Be bold, brave, and different.”
Like everyone else around you.

So I studied the uniform: all-black wardrobe, circle glasses, “creative” sneakers that cost 2x rent in the countryside. I downloaded the dialect: Droga quotes, W+K worship, performative disdain for briefs (until the client calls). I learned the ritual: the gravel-voiced manifesto, the slow-mo footage, the obligatory NGO spot no one asked for.

Within months… well, maybe years, I became it: The Average Adman.

You know the vibe: he sits on stools in panel talks, says “storytelling” like it’s sacred scripture, has at least one Medium piece titled “Advertising is dead.”

I mastered the cult choreography:
→ Arrive late, but ideologically.
→ Drag “mediocrity” while designing the same carousel for three FMCG clients.
→ Use “disruptive” to describe oat milk. Again.

They… (They is not an actual person but an entity that hunts the industry)… So yes, they told us to be brave but only in pre-approved, pastel-safe ways. Say something “radical,” just not enough to spook any client director. Push boundaries, until legal coughs. Be rebellious but backed by a 42-slide Keynote and a safety net of case studies.

And you start to wonder: Are we admen or just content sommeliers, sniffing notes of disruption in the algorithm’s latest blend? What once felt electric, risk, point of view, gut instinct…. got rewired into compliance. And by pitch five, “breaking the rules” started to feel like buying it on subscription.

It felt as if the industry didn’t want individuals. It wanted a very specific kind of different. Different but pre-approved, pitch-safe, Instagrammable. In fact, what looked like rebellion was just onboarding. We weren’t hired to invent. We were hired to repackage. To turn bold into safe.

By year three, I wasn’t making ideas. I was crafting tributes: homages to Cannes winners past, strung together with slightly edgier fonts. A remix of last year’s disruption, with better lighting and a subtle touch of DE&I.

We didn’t break the mold. We built a store selling it in four neutral tones. We drank the Kool-Aid. And then rebranded it for Gen Z with a pastel palette and a paid influencer collab.

And the kicker?

It’s not that advertising rejected originality. It just that more often than not, the industry draged it through so many “alignment meetings” it ends up as a shampoo ad narrated by Morgan Freeman’s cousin.

The real enemy wasn’t mediocrity. It was the performance of originality. The illusion of individuality, printed in Helvetica across every glass wall:

“Be Bold. Be Brave. Be Exactly Like the Last Award-Winning Case Study.”

This industry didn’t kill creativity. It replaced it, very efficiently, with a “brave” idea that works across 14 formats and already has a paid media plan.

Why am I writing in past tense?  Well, with AI I’m not sure that industry I meet a few days ago even exists anymore. Or maybe it’s just a wish because humans we are very good at doing the same differently. New tools, same shit. Hope I’m wrong (Damn, I know I’m not).

In fact, that’s also the true genius of advertising: Tell you to stand out, while handing you the costume. Give you the mold and told you it’s clay. Send you to Cannes, to realize: everyone’s wearing the same black t-shirt, quoting the same truths, chasing the same algorithm.

But that’s okay.

It really is.

It unites us.

Makes us part of a herd.

So, we’re not alone.

We just are…

The Average Adman.

Bold. Brave. Undifferent.

(Voiceover by gravel guy, obviously.)

PS: So yes, if still needed, I’m here to help you fit in, within the different herd.

Uniforms sold separately here.

Average is Killing Us.

By Brand Purpose & ResponsibilityNo Comments

Yes, Average is killing us.
Not in the meh, mid kind of way.
In the planet’s-on-fire, democracy’s-on-life-support, sea-level’s-in-your-living-room kind of way.

And not only because of evil masterminds, bond villains, or shadowy elites in hoodies… but also because of average minds. The latter bering the most dangerous.

The mildly indifferent.
The conveniently neutral.
The everyman with mid opinions.

The people who say “I’m not political” while doomscrolling in silence, refreshing like neutrality is a moral stance.

I get it:
We all want to belong.
It’s a universal insight.
We are mammals.
The herd is our protection.
It’s our home.
It’s the idea behind every Christmas ad.
It’s biology.
It’s survival.

Really?

Is it survival or our resignation letter?
Is it survival or our path to oblivion?

 

 

Here’s a moment to pause…

To reflect…

 

 

 

And to excuse my dramatism.
Sometimes I enjoy it almost as much as sarcasm. Almost.

So, back to the game:

My point is that everything has a price.
And belonging to average has a very high one.

The price of ending up with nowhere left to belong.
The price of belonging to the species that ended it all once and for good.

And the worst part?
Average feels normal.
Comfy.
Like a lukewarm bath filled with lukewarm opinions.
Safe from extremes.
Safe from progress.
Safe from ever being wrong or right (which equals wrong).

The everyman rewards fitting in, and standing out is risky.
Being brilliant is only cool once you’ve already made it.
Genius gets watered down until it can be printed on a tote bag.
Preferably beige. Preferably ironic.

In fact, in advertising, we embrace that averageness.
That’s where the key insight hides.
That’s what we build many of our campaigns on.
And that’s what makes most business scalable.

So yes, average is profitable.
Big time.
Short term.
Last time.

Average is killing us.
And business, frankly, is booming.

As of now, some will die rich.
Others will die average.
All dead.

But that hasn’t happened yet.
We can still turn things around.
(cue epic music you secretly hate but secretly love)

Especially those working in advertising.

Brands come to us asking what to say, what to do.
They want us to reach millions with our messages.
To sell. Sure.
But also…

We’ve got a unique opportunity to turn things around.

Instead of using average as the ultimate target truth,
we can turn it into the target’s starting point.

Yes, we live in an average world, statistically speaking.
Yes, Average is killing us.

But we won’t let it.

People can stay average.
But also have the potential to grow, change, evolve.

And those in advertising we have the unique power change that.
The power to kill average.
Kill it day after day.
Striving and going further everyday.
Raising average standards higher and higher.
You know, same as we’re doing with sea levels but on purpose and for good.

So, let’s push it until there is no average left.
That’s my call to action.

And I know, that’s what all admen say.
But hey, that’s exactly why I say it.
After all, that’s who I am:

I’m the Average Adman,
and I despise average.

Talking of which, I’ve got tote bags, a clothes line and a full store about it.

I Was Once Everything You’ve Seen Before.

By Personal JourneyNo Comments

(The Origin Story No One Asked For)

I had the glasses.
The black t-shirt.
The neatly trimmed beard.
I was him, yet another slightly tortured, slightly caffeinated adman living in a major city, saying things like “let’s push the brief” while pushing myself toward the next existential crisis.

New York. London. Paris. Barcelona.
Different skyline. Same pitch room.
Same buzzwords.
Same almond milk flat white.
Same half-dead look behind the eyes that says: “I’m on my fourth campaign about ‘connection’ and I haven’t connected with a real human since 2019.”

I worked at some agencies we all follow(ed).
For some clients we all envy.
Making the kind of work that gets shortlisted and then quietly forgotten by Tuesday.

And for a while, that was enough.
The title. The agency parties. The feeling of being “in.”
I could speak the dialect of case studies fluently.
I had the LinkedIn swagger.
I even had a portfolio that made recruiters say, “Wow, impressive. Very W+K meets early Droga.”

But something felt off.
Like I’d spent so long trying to be different, I’d become just another variation of the same archetype.
Same references. Same case studies. Same “authentic” voiceover guy.

Then one day, no dramatic event, just a quiet Tuesday… I cracked.
Sat in front of yet another deck titled “Disrupting the Everyday” while realizing I was the everyday we kept pretending to disrupt. Within the adworld.

It hit me like a triple-shot oat milk irony bomb:
I wasn’t bolder than anyone in advertising. I wasn’t braver than my peers in other agencies. I was advertising beige.

Not in a bad way.
Not in the endearing “mid-century modern” kind of beige but beige with capital B.

In a statistically average way, for adland.

The kind that comes from swimming too long in the same creative soup as everyone else, until you lose your flavor and just become… broth.

So I kept going.

I didn’t go on a vision quest. I didn’t microdose in the desert (though, tempting).
I just got honest.

I kept trying to be original.
Kept pretending I was the one who “saw things differently.”
I kept trying to be the loudest.
I stopped trying to be real.
It was easy already but now with AI, it’s even easier.
Because in a world of curated chaos and contrived “disruption,” being the Average Adman is practically punk. Or at least that’s what I tell myself while drying my tears in your agency’s toilet.

Because spoiler: That’s what we do.
We all post that.
We all pitch that.

That’s how I leaned deeper into the truth:
I am The Average Adman.

So, now?
Now I use it all against itself (myself?).

I turned my advertising midlife crisis into a brand. A brand no one cares about but still, a brand. And my agency trauma into performance art (yes, I still need to feel I’m creating something worth it: art). And my beige energy turned into satire so sharp no one talks about it.

Because here’s the thing:
Owning my averageness in advertising didn’t make me weak.
It made me dangerous, in a tote bag kind of way.

So here I am.
Still in black.
Still with the glasses.

But now I wear them with full self-awareness and mild contempt.

Welcome to the origin story of The Average Adman.

The Average Adman
Bold. Brave. Undifferent.

Confessions of an Average Adman

By Personal JourneyNo Comments

From Stock Image to Storyteller
(An unauthorized remake of a book nobody reads anymore)


Confession 1: I Looked the Part Before I Knew the Lines.

Long before I had a voice, I had the uniform. Stock glasses. Stock smirk. Stock “creative” headshot—shot against a brick wall, obviously. I looked like I had ideas. I didn’t. But I could quote Ogilvy. And in this industry, that’s halfway to thought leadership.


Confession 2: I Didn’t Know What I Was Doing. So I Made a Deck About It.

My early ideas were… bad. Like “rebrand peanuts for Gen Z” bad. Then a famous brand did it for real but that didn’t make the idea better. What I learned was that confidence matters more than craft. So I made slides. Lots of slides. Slides with arrows and visuals. Visuals are key. And slides with purpose statements that made people cry (or at least blink slowly).

Every time I felt lost, I’d write “insight-led, culturally resonant, emotionally compelling.” No one ever asked what it really meant. And we all kept dancing along.


Confession 3: I Wasn’t Breaking Molds. I Was Downloading Templates.

Every “brave” campaign I pitched had three references from the same Cannes shortlist. Every “original” strategy had the same three buzzwords. I thought I was shaping culture. Turns out, I was recycling decks from last year with slightly newer fonts. And still, I got promoted.

Because in advertising, you either stand out or stand in the right room long enough to blend in strategically.


Confession 4: The Real Turning Point (Was a Google Drive Folder).

It wasn’t a burn out. It wasn’t a post by David Trott.  It wasn’t a shooting in South Africa. It was opening a folder titled “Final_Final_V37_FORREAL_THISONE.pptx”. Inside: 46 decks. Same case studies. Same fonts. Same “bold” ideas.

And this is how it quietly hit me: That wasn’t storytelling. It was stock-piling. A Pinterest board of recycled cleverness.


Confession 5: I Found My Voice When I Lost My Pitch.

One day, the client didn’t bite. One of many but this one hit a chord. Not because the idea was too risky but because it was exactly like the last three they’d seen.

The silence that followed wasn’t defeat. It was relief.


Confession 6: I Still Look Like a Stock Image. But Now I Write My Own prompts in Chat GTP.

Let’s be honest: I’m still The Average Adman. I still wear black. Still quote Droga (ironically now). Still get excited about ad campaigns that make no sense but look great on Instagram. But something changed: Now I know it’s a costume. I might forget at times but still, it feels good to make fun of myself.

Because the truth is:
Every adman wants to stand out.
But the boldest thing I can do in this industry today?

Embrace I’m just like the rest.
And say it out loud.

And just like this, I’ve written a new post.

And just like this, I share the link to the Average Adman Pride Store.

The World is Broken. Your Brand Should be Trying to Fix It.

By Brand Purpose & ResponsibilityNo Comments

CRITICIZING PURPOSE IS SO AVERAGE ADMAN, I MADE A POST ABOUT IT.

Warning: this post openly contradicts Average is Killing us. On purpose.

 

The planet’s melting. Democracies are glitching. Billionaires are launching themselves into space while your cousin can’t afford rent. And somewhere in the middle of this dystopian musical… your snack brand drops a climate-positive tortilla chip.

Because in the face of global collapse, what we need isn’t policy or action.
It’s branded content. Short-form. Optimized. Shot in 4K with subtle lens flares and a whispered voiceover that says: “We believe in better.”

Humanity is crumbling under environmental, societal, and economic pressure…
and brands are showing up with moodboards. Ticking boxes. Chasing KPIs. Launching Purpose like it’s a limited-edition product drop.

And sure, some brands do try: Patagonia. Dove. Ben & Jerry’s.
The Holy Trinity of Case Study Slides.

But for every one of them, there are a thousand others trying to solve systemic inequality with a seasonal hashtag and a DE&I panel moderated by their Head of HR.

We keep saying brands have power. That they should lead society toward change. But most can’t even lead their own creative approval process without a nine-person Zoom and a six-week delay.

Still, the narrative persists (purpose is not fully dead): “Your brand can be a catalyst for good.” Translation: Make it look like you care but not enough to scare shareholders.

Because real change?

That’s hard.
It’s messy.
It’s not A/B tested.

Want to change the world? Start by paying your interns. Then maybe don’t brief your creative team to solve racism in 48 hours with a stock image and a pun. And if you are a brand… whatever. I won’t say anything, I still need your money.

But let’s be honest:

Half of us only discovered social issues existed when your intern suggested a Pride post in 2018.

But now?
You’re here to save the world.
One climate-positive oat milk collab at a time.

Unless your brand is doing more than launching a new SKU with a recycled manifesto… you’re not fixing anything. You’re cosplaying impact.

We don’t need more brands pretending to be saviors.
We need fewer pretending they’re not part of the problem.

But still, in my next brief, I’ll probably drop another Purpose Capsule.
Call it Hope 2.0.
Put it on a tote bag.
Sell it for €168.
(visit store for actual price)

Because if the world’s going down…
you might as well monetize the fall.

So sure, I’ll slap a purpose line under my logo. It’s cheaper than therapy.

And then what happened? As I finish “writing” this article. Chat GTP asks: Do you want me to write a new article titled How to Save the World in 6 Paid Posts or Less”? I say yes!

The Aesthetic of the Bold, Brave and Different

By Advertising Industry SatireNo Comments
Or Why Every Brand Trying to Zig Ends Up in the Same Moodboard.

 

This is not an article.
It’s a borderline pretentious discourse
disguised as cultural exorcism.
Let us begin, as all self-proclaimed
brave campaigns do, with a manifesto:
What was the last ad that shook you?
Not entertained you.
Not impressed you.
Shook you.
Really shook you.
Hard to name one.
Because the boldest, bravest, most different things
don’t happen in adland.
They happen in life.
A parent dies.
You have a baby and lose yourself.
You’re fired.
You’re cheated on.
You slip into poverty.
You sit on a 2am bus after a shift with no end.
You nurse a parent who no longer knows your name.
You collapse. No one claps.
These are the things that rip you open.
Not an ad.
No matter how hard it tries.
Advertising was never meant to compete with that.
It was meant to perform.
To build salience.
Create memory.
Move units.
That’s why the aesthetic of bold, brave and different isn’t a reality.
It’s a performance.
Once, we had gorillas playing drums.
Horses riding the sea.
Yellow puppets selling jeans.
Meerkat puppets.
But…
Apple’s puppets?
Virgin’s riding animals??
AI gorillas with selfies sticks???!
That’s how boldness becomes an aesthetic:
A repeatable palette of ideas, jokes and styles.
Bravery turned into choreography.
Different turned into the same Different.
If your brand looks like it might have opinions, it gets applauded.
Even if the opinion is just: “We see you.”
(The legal team sees you too.)
Innovation moved elsewhere.
Into the font.
The illusion of edge.
The gravel added to the VO.
What remains isn’t a campaign.
It’s a cultural dress rehearsal.
This isn’t creativity.
It’s creative cosplay.
Brands aren’t taking risks.
They’re too scared to be ugly.
Too polished to be real.
And the industry knows it.
It’s full of exhausted insiders
who know exactly what gets approved.
People who had their genuinely brave ideas killed often enough
to learn a safer kind of different.
So they pitch what clients buy.
What juries nod at.
What gets 59 LinkedIn likes by Monday.
(Hey, I know this isn’t your case. I’m just projecting my own shit
onto the world. Bear with me… or don’t. All good, either way.)
We systematized creativity.
Optimized it.
Built a loop that feeds itself better than it feeds us.
Together, this turns boldness into an illusion.
Everyone’s playing the game.
Even the rebels.
Especially the rebels.
The result?
Predictable edginess.
Prefab provocation.
Safe danger.
Manufactured chaos.
Like the kind I’m recreating here.
And no. AI didn’t kill creativity.
It just held up the mirror:
We’ve been machines for years.
Our visual grammar is so templated, so echo-chambered,
that a machine can now recreate an entire
2025 Cannes pitch deck in seconds.
And this changes nothing.
The industry will keep prompting what worked.
Clients will approve what they’ve seen.
The aesthetics of boldness, bravery and difference
will be absorbed, flattened and mass-produced.
AI just lowered the cost of pretending.
But don’t blame the machine.
Blame the hunger.
The scarcity mindset behind all this yelling.
The belief that if we don’t cry louder, we won’t be fed.
Because that’s the real aesthetic of boldness.
Not edge.
Fear.
We perform boldness because we fear invisibility.
We perform bravery because we fear irrelevance.
We perform difference because we fear replacement.
What do scared people do?
They scream.
We are professionalized crying.
Brands yelling louder, hoping someone, anyone, looks their way.
Let’s continue this dissertation:
(yes, I don’t really know what I’m doing and I’m slightly ashamed).
So, many brands aren’t just scared.
They don’t even know who they are.
So they outsource personality to aesthetics and call it identity.
They borrow codes.
Pay agencies to find a “tone.”
And most products don’t matter.
Sugared water.
Edible foam.
Energy drinks in a world already exhausted.
We’re asked to sell things with
no intrinsic difference from the thing beside them.
So we paint them.
Wrap them.
Choreograph them into meaning.
Advertising doesn’t sell products anymore.
It sells excuses for their existence.
That’s what makes the Average Adman.
Not a person.
A process.
He’s the inevitable byproduct of
the aesthetic of the Bold, Brave and Different.
He saw the broken mirror too late.
Mid-career.
Already trapped in the circus.
So he stays.
And performs.
And this article?
It’s part of the show too.
Just another baby crying —
hoping mum looks this way.
— The Average Adman
Adjunct Professor of Scented Puppetry
Dean of the Faculty of Crying Louder Than the Other Baby
Guest Lecturer at the School of Algorithmic Repetition